On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:36:17AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Kosa Attila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Severity: important
This is my log part:
This is on a sarge system, isn't it?
Yes, my system is Sarge. Productive system, HA (samba + ldap),
~200 user, ~1TB hdd
notfound 416411 3.0.24-6
thanks
Yes, my system is Sarge. Productive system, HA (samba + ldap),
~200 user, ~1TB hdd (user's data).
Are you in position to try reproducing this on an etch system?
Vmware server, 2 virtual machine (Etch samba + ldap and Windows
XP). Working good.
Of
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 06:25:44PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
notfound 416411 3.0.24-6
thanks
Yes, my system is Sarge. Productive system, HA (samba + ldap),
~200 user, ~1TB hdd (user's data).
Are you in position to try reproducing this on an etch system?
Vmware server, 2
Package: samba
Severity: important
This is my log part:
[2007/03/27 17:26:36, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:check_posix_acl_group_write(3912)
check_posix_acl_group_write: file my_directory_name failed to match on user
or group in token (ret = -1).
[2007/03/27 17:26:36, 10]
found 416411 3.0.14a-3sarge4
thanks
Unless we get more details from the bug reporter, this bug seems to be
reported for the sarge package.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Kosa Attila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Severity: important
This is my log part:
This is on a sarge system, isn't it?
Are you in position to try reproducing this on an etch system?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo
