On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:38 am, Jason Harrison wrote:
Greetings,
I think this package also needs to now depend on one of the header
packages
that provides /usr/include/linux/utsrelease.h. In my case the
package that
enabled the package to build was linux-headers-2.6.21-1-k7.
I have also
Turns out there's a simpler solution - adding a build-depends on
linux-kernel-headers. linux/version.h in that package still contains
the UTS_RELEASE symbol. No patch to acinclude required (at least,
not urgently - I'm still going to report this issue upstream though)
Tim
--
The
Well, of course those other two files are derived files, so the
acinclude file is actually the only one that needs modifying, as long
as I modify the rules file to rebuild the configure script by running
autoconf.
The linux-headers thing is going to be a real headache. How do you
On 20 Jun 2007, at 4:45 pm, Jason Harrison wrote:
Well, of course those other two files are derived files, so the
acinclude file is actually the only one that needs modifying, as long
as I modify the rules file to rebuild the configure script by running
autoconf.
The linux-headers thing is
I've just had a look at the daily CVS snapshot of am-utils, and they
will have fixed this properly in 6.1.6. They're fixing autoconf, as
per your original suggestion, but a different way - not using the
utsrelease header, but using Fedora's code, which changes it to use a
different symbol
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5
Followup-For: Bug #427260
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that seems to fix the problem. Please review and if
acceptable apply.
Regards,
Jason
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
On 19 Jun 2007, at 8:37 pm, Jason Harrison wrote:
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5
Followup-For: Bug #427260
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that seems to fix the problem. Please
review and if
acceptable apply.
Er, have you attached the patch? Perhaps I'm being myopic but I
can't
Greetings,
Not sure why the attachment did not work. Anyways here it is again.
Regards,
Jason
--- acinclude.m4 2006-05-11 13:28:18.0 -0400
+++ acinclude.m4.new 2007-06-19 15:28:19.0 -0400
@@ -10158,6 +10158,7 @@
[
#include stdio.h
#include linux/version.h
+#include
Er, have you attached the patch? Perhaps I'm being myopic but I
can't see it...
Tim
Greetings,
Yes I sent another email with the attachment. For some reason reportbug -A
am-utils-6.1.5.patch did not send the attachment. Not sure what went wrong.
Let me know if anything else is amiss.
Greetings,
I think this package also needs to now depend on one of the header packages
that provides /usr/include/linux/utsrelease.h. In my case the package that
enabled the package to build was linux-headers-2.6.21-1-k7.
I have also attached another patch file. I discovered that several
10 matches
Mail list logo
