Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose the fact that you could install
tetex-base 2007-9 w/o also pulling in texlive or some other useful
pacakge is another bug.
Exactly - but since tetex-base is not supposed to depend on anything
(it's an empty transitional package), we should let
Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:26:19PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it seems that this not a grave bug since it is installable, but
perhaps it is still serious bug since it doesn't have sufficient
dependencies to
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:59:23AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In order to understand what is going on, we need the packages which are
actually installed on your system. Please send the output of
dpkg -l tex-common
dpkg -l tetex* | grep -v '^un'
Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, so the problem turned out to be that aptitutde had decided to
upgrade tetex-base to 2007-9 instead of leaving it at 3.whatever (I
could have sworn I told it not to do that, but that's another story).
So, it seems that this not a grave bug since it is
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:26:19PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it seems that this not a grave bug since it is installable, but
perhaps it is still serious bug since it doesn't have sufficient
dependencies to ensure installability? At any rate, that's
OK, so the problem turned out to be that aptitutde had decided to
upgrade tetex-base to 2007-9 instead of leaving it at 3.whatever (I
could have sworn I told it not to do that, but that's another story).
So, it seems that this not a grave bug since it is installable, but
perhaps it is still
6 matches
Mail list logo
