Bug#432861: Compiles arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c from Linux 2.6.22 incorrectly

2007-07-14 Thread Martin Orr
On 12/07/07 22:04, Touko Korpela wrote: Martin Orr wrote: binutils (= 2.17cvs20070426) | 2.17.20070406cvs-2 I don't know if it makes difference but you should try to upgrade binutils away from that version from experimental. Nothing to do with this bug, but thanks for pointing it

Bug#432861: Compiles arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c from Linux 2.6.22 incorrectly

2007-07-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Martin Orr writes: Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2-20070707-1 Severity: important When I build the kernel (either 2.6.21 or 2.6.22) with gcc 4.2-20070707-1, then try to boot, I get a hang in udevsettle. If I build with gcc 4.2-20070627-1, everything is fine. please recheck with

Bug#432861: Compiles arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c from Linux 2.6.22 incorrectly

2007-07-12 Thread Martin Orr
Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2-20070707-1 Severity: important When I build the kernel (either 2.6.21 or 2.6.22) with gcc 4.2-20070707-1, then try to boot, I get a hang in udevsettle. If I build with gcc 4.2-20070627-1, everything is fine. The file which matters is arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c.

Bug#432861: Compiles arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c from Linux 2.6.22 incorrectly

2007-07-12 Thread Touko Korpela
Martin Orr wrote: binutils (= 2.17cvs20070426) | 2.17.20070406cvs-2 I don't know if it makes difference but you should try to upgrade binutils away from that version from experimental. Apt and other utils think that experimental has bigger version number than more recent in unstable.