Bug#435185: Reply

2007-08-03 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:33PM +0700, Sikon wrote: Having qca2 as a separate source package would make sense, I think, as they're completely API-incompatible. qca2 was uploaded yesterday. However, the maintainer would have to resolve the problem of /usr/lib/libqca.so being present in

Bug#435185: Reply

2007-08-03 Thread Sikon
Having qca2 as a separate source package would make sense, I think, as they're completely API-incompatible. However, the maintainer would have to resolve the problem of /usr/lib/libqca.so being present in both qca-dev and libqca2-dev. Of course, it would have been better if upstream renamed the