Twas brillig at 10:58:59 17.09.2007 UTC+02 when Gerfried Fuchs did gyre and gimble:
GF> Why do you call "Properly"? This sounds like the NMU I did wasn't proper GF> - whereas the diff clearly shows that there is no difference between the GF> NMU and the new upstream release. Calm down a bit. "Properly" just means "as upstream does". I'd change changelog entry in next upload if you want to. GF> Thanks for making it sound that my NMU wasn't proper, and thanks for not GF> having cared about this RC bugs before but now claiming you did care for it GF> "properly"... Sponsorship introduces delays, know ya? I had the identical package, but it was stuck at my sponsor, so you've been first. Anyway, I did not get bug from saying "NMU" from you with NMU patch applied, as NMU procedure *dictates*, so I did not care to check the changes you introduce, as upstream fixed them in it's own way. -- JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
