Control: tags -1 - confirmed + wontfix
2012-09-14 12:15 Daniel Hartwig:
Control: retitle -1 aptitude: [curses] actions on package sets should respect
holds
Control: tags -1 confirmed
The reasoning here is that holds, etc. should be respected unless a user
performs an action specifically on a
Michal has explained in private email that what he wants is for '+' to
be a no-op on held packages (and presumably also '-' and '_'). This is
an interesting idea but also a radical departure from how aptitude has
traditionally behaved. It will require some thought. (if, as is
likely, I don't
On Nov 24, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:48:40PM +0100, Michal Suchanek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
When I use h in the curses interface to hold package in its
current state
aptitude still considers the package upgradeable. Thus if I hold
for
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:56:44PM +0100, Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Nov 24, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
If I set packages to a hold state, they seem to be held properly.
Perhaps there are some packages that depend on newer versions of the
packages
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.6.1-1.1
Severity: normal
When I use h in the curses interface to hold package in its current state
aptitude still considers the package upgradeable. Thus if I hold for example my
graphics driver because the new versions are broken I can no longer use u on
the X11
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:48:40PM +0100, Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
When I use h in the curses interface to hold package in its current state
aptitude still considers the package upgradeable. Thus if I hold for example
my
graphics driver because the new versions are
6 matches
Mail list logo
