Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2008-01-01 Thread Michael Shuler
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html

was updated 2007.12.28-29 with appropriate public domain notes.  Build away!

-- 
Kind Regards,
Michael Shuler



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-12-03 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:24:48AM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
 * Package name: djbdns
   Version : 1.05

Hi, after maintaining binary packages of djbdns and co. unofficially
since more than six years through http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/, I'd
be interested in maintaining them through the Debian archive in the
future.

Regards, Gerrit.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-12-03 Thread Robert Edmonds
owner 453680 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner 453684 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks

Gerrit Pape wrote:
 Hi, after maintaining binary packages of djbdns and co. unofficially
 since more than six years through http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/, I'd
 be interested in maintaining them through the Debian archive in the
 future.

Hi, they're yours.

-- 
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Michael Shuler
On 11/30/2007 10:28 AM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
 See the video clip on google video, which is dated yesterday.  He says
 the pages on his site will be updated soon.  (Obviously I won't upload
 packages until the license change really does occur.)

Ah, I see - excellent.

 What would be the point of *-installer packages for djb software if the
 code becomes DFSG compatible?

None - you are absolutely correct.  I would then like to formally
request that the following current patches in BTS for djbdns-installer
be included (or at least seriously considered) in the djbdns package, if
the binary redistribution stars align:

#107578: djbdns-installer: IPv6 record types not supported (Merged with
#107579)
#243323: extra file in package (djbdns-conf-fhs)
#274000: djbdns-installer: typo in description of tinydns
#432900: Please add one-second.patch for performance
#432903: Please add native SRV type to tinydns-data / axfr-get
#432471: Truncation of alias chains by tinydns and axfrdns
#447950: Advisory - L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing to 199.7.83.42 on
2007-11-01 (includes #432459: B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET IP address changed)

A couple of these are minor/cosmetic (typo and djbdns-conf-fhs), the
root servers are necessary, but IPv6, one-second, SRV, and the alias
chain patch are highly important in our environment.

My real desire is to have all the proper bits in place in the Debian
package (binary or -installer) for our production authoritative server
infrastructure, without the need to roll our own custom .deb's anymore.
 If Lenny releases to stable with all the right stuff, then I will be a
happy user.

Thanks for the vid link, Robert - I just saw your post to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and your link was not posted in BTS as of my reading.

Do let me know if you need any help as you go along - we run a very
large tinydns system at work.

-- 
Warm Regards,
Michael Shuler



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Michael Shuler
On 11/30/2007 09:24 AM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
 Supposedly DJB has released all of his code into the public domain.  If
 this is really the case and passes DFSG, I plan to package djbdns
 assuming Adam McKenna (maintainer of djbdns-installer) doesn't want to.

Please provide the source documenting this copyrite/license change.  I
took a look at DJB's site and found no indication of this change, nor
has there been any discussion/announcement on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list.  DJB has been very clear for years about the software
being public domain, but that redistribution of binaries is a completely
different matter [0]

In the last 6-9 months of multiple direct emails, bug reports, etc., I
have received a single reply from Adam without any follow-up to
subsequent messages.  I had intended to work on an eventual sponsored
NMU, and would be quite happy to help a fix up djbdns-installer.  I
asked around on #d-mentors, sent a detailed email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 08/20/2007, and basically got a casual OK to hijack the package.  If
you want to hijack djbdns-installer, I would be grateful to have a full
DD as maintainer, so I can help out without asking for random
sponsorship.  ;)

[0] http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
-- 
Kind Regards,
Michael Shuler



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Robert Edmonds
Michael Shuler wrote:
 Please provide the source documenting this copyrite/license change.  I
 took a look at DJB's site and found no indication of this change, nor
 has there been any discussion/announcement on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailing list.  DJB has been very clear for years about the software
 being public domain, but that redistribution of binaries is a completely
 different matter [0]

See the video clip on google video, which is dated yesterday.  He says
the pages on his site will be updated soon.  (Obviously I won't upload
packages until the license change really does occur.)

 In the last 6-9 months of multiple direct emails, bug reports, etc., I
 have received a single reply from Adam without any follow-up to
 subsequent messages.  I had intended to work on an eventual sponsored
 NMU, and would be quite happy to help a fix up djbdns-installer.  I
 asked around on #d-mentors, sent a detailed email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 on 08/20/2007, and basically got a casual OK to hijack the package.  If
 you want to hijack djbdns-installer, I would be grateful to have a full
 DD as maintainer, so I can help out without asking for random
 sponsorship.  ;)

What would be the point of *-installer packages for djb software if the
code becomes DFSG compatible?

-- 
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Leo costela Antunes
[cc'ing Adam to bring this to the bug log]

Robert Edmonds wrote:
 Supposedly DJB has released all of his code into the public domain.  If
 this is really the case and passes DFSG, I plan to package djbdns
 assuming Adam McKenna (maintainer of djbdns-installer) doesn't want to.

Perhaps you could have talked to Adam before filling an ITP?
You could even arrange some sort of co-maintainance, if you already have
some work done.

And just for the record, to back your claims, as of now Qmail's page[0]
says:
I hereby place the qmail package (in particular, qmail-1.03.tar.gz,
with MD5 checksum 622f65f982e380dbe86e6574f3abcb7c) into the public domain.

Cheers and good luck with the package

[0] http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html

-- 
Leo costela Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Robert Edmonds
Package: wnpp
Owner: Robert S. Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: djbdns
  Version : 1.05
  Upstream Author : Daniel J. Bernstein
* URL : http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html
* License : public domain
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein
 The following were taken from various HTML pages under
 http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html
 .
 dnscache is a local DNS cache. It accepts recursive DNS queries from
 local clients such as web browsers and mail transfer agents. It
 collects responses from remote DNS servers. It caches the responses to
 save time later.
 .
 tinydns is a DNS server. It accepts iterative DNS queries from hosts
 around the Internet, and responds with locally configured information.
 .
 pickdns is a load-balancing DNS server. It accepts iterative DNS
 queries from hosts around the Internet, and responds with a dynamic
 selection of locally configured IP addresses with 5-second TTLs.
 .
 walldns is a reverse DNS wall. It accepts iterative DNS queries for
 in-addr.arpa domains from hosts around the Internet, and supplies
 generic responses that avoid revealing local host information.
 .
 rbldns is an IP-address-listing DNS server. It accepts iterative
 DNS queries from hosts around the Internet asking about various IP
 addresses.  It provides responses showing whether the addresses are on
 a locally configured list, such as RBL or DUL.
 .
 axfrdns is a DNS zone-transfer server. It reads a zone-transfer
 request in DNS-over-TCP format from its standard input, and responds
 with locally configured information.
 .
 The security of this software is guaranteed by the author.  Details of
 the guarantee can be found at http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/guarantee.html

 (snagged from the djbdns-installer djbdns description)

Supposedly DJB has released all of his code into the public domain.  If
this is really the case and passes DFSG, I plan to package djbdns
assuming Adam McKenna (maintainer of djbdns-installer) doesn't want to.

-- 
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein

2007-11-30 Thread Robert Edmonds
Hi,

Leo costela Antunes wrote:
 [cc'ing Adam to bring this to the bug log]
 
 Robert Edmonds wrote:
  Supposedly DJB has released all of his code into the public domain.  If
  this is really the case and passes DFSG, I plan to package djbdns
  assuming Adam McKenna (maintainer of djbdns-installer) doesn't want to.
 
 Perhaps you could have talked to Adam before filling an ITP?
 You could even arrange some sort of co-maintainance, if you already have
 some work done.

What's wrong with using the BTS to communicate?  Note,

  X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam D. McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 And just for the record, to back your claims, as of now Qmail's page[0]
 says:
 I hereby place the qmail package (in particular, qmail-1.03.tar.gz,
 with MD5 checksum 622f65f982e380dbe86e6574f3abcb7c) into the public domain.
 
 Cheers and good luck with the package

Yes, there is also [0] where he says all of his past and future code
will be public domain.

[0] http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3147768955127254412hl=en

-- 
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature