Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Also, the warning could include the patch name as a useful hint :)
Yeah, it actually was -- that's how I figured out the problem. It was
warning about the patch . :)
Ah, nice, then :)
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.38
Severity: normal
Hi,
It looks like lintian gives a bogus warning for dpatch-missing-description
because of the 00list index file:
% ls debian/patches
00list 10_no_lib64_on_64_bits.dpatch 11_always_smp.dpatch
12_acc_enable_radius_diameter.dpatch
% grep DP:
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the blank line in 00list.
Will be fixed in the next upload.
Great, thanks !
Also, the warning could include the patch name as a useful hint :)
Yeah, it actually was -- that's how I figured out the problem.
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Patches for both packages have a description. I haven't tested my
other packages but I guess the result would be the same.
It's the blank line in 00list.
Will be fixed in the next upload.
Great, thanks !
Also, the warning could include the patch
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I encountered that issue first on openser (in experimental), but also
on iaxmodem (in 1.0.0~dfsg-1, incoming or unstable).
Patches for both packages have a description. I haven't tested my
other packages but I guess the result would be the same.
It's
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.38
Severity: normal
It looks like lintian gives a bogus warning for
dpatch-missing-description because of the 00list index file:
Looking at the code, it looks like it should do the right thing, but this
certainly sounds
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It looks like lintian gives a bogus warning for
dpatch-missing-description because of the 00list index file:
Looking at the code, it looks like it should do the right thing, but this
certainly sounds broken. Is this package in the archive, and if
7 matches
Mail list logo
