Am Samstag, den 29.12.2007, 00:44 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Uploaded. Lets see if it's taken by an amd64 autobuilder, if not, feel
> free to prod me to upload that one too...
Great, thanks! However, this will not happen within the next week since
I am on vacation till ~Jan 02.
Cheers,
Fabian
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
>> Can you also include the security fix (patch 11) please?
>
> Sure. I also changed the Architecture field in debian/control to reflect
> only i386/amd64 and uploaded the package again to mentors.d.n.
>
> I'll b
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Can you also include the security fix (patch 11) please?
Sure. I also changed the Architecture field in debian/control to reflect
only i386/amd64 and uploaded the package again to mentors.d.n.
I'll be glad if you sponsored this upload.
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> retitle 458052 RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel
> powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS not big-endian safe
> thanks
>
> Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 14:41 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
>> Can you please upload a fixed package to stable and retitle the
>> bugre
retitle 458052 RM: unace-nonfree/stable [alpha arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel
powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS not big-endian safe
thanks
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 14:41 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Can you please upload a fixed package to stable and retitle the
> bugreport accordingly?
Sure. The fixed p
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
>> Do you think the patch to fix the 64-bit issue is small enough to have
>> it included in the next point release?
>
> Yes: The patch itself is <4kB and affects only one single file.
Can you please upload a fixe
Am Freitag, den 28.12.2007, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Do you think the patch to fix the 64-bit issue is small enough to have
> it included in the next point release?
Yes: The patch itself is <4kB and affects only one single file.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> package: ftp.debian.org
>
> Hi!
Hi
> A code audit revealed that unace-nonfree 2.5-1 in stable is neither
> 64bit- nor big-endian clean.
>
> Revision -3 in unstable is 64bit-clean but still not big-endian-clean
> (will file another bug report). For revision -3 I enabled
package: ftp.debian.org
Hi!
A code audit revealed that unace-nonfree 2.5-1 in stable is neither
64bit- nor big-endian clean.
Revision -3 in unstable is 64bit-clean but still not big-endian-clean
(will file another bug report). For revision -3 I enabled only i386 and
amd64 as build archs, because
9 matches
Mail list logo
