Version: 1:6.8.191-1
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:29:21 +0200 Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Have you been able to try a newer version of the driver? FWIW, I can't
reproduce the problem using current upstream development snapshots of
the driver and X server, though this is using an R300
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 15:43 -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:32:45 +0200 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does
Option EXANoComposite
help ?
Yes, if I add
Option EXANoComposite true
and comment out
Option RenderAccel off
things seem to work
Does
Option EXANoComposite
help ?
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:32:45 +0200 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does
Option EXANoComposite
help ?
Yes, if I add
Option EXANoComposite true
and comment out
Option RenderAccel off
things seem to work properly, AFAICT.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:58:37 -0400 Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:13:45 +0100 Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The default value of Option AGPMode may be different between
versions.
Indeed. My log from 1:6.7.x says: Using AGP 1x, while my log from
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:52 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
It appears that the screen corruption issue that I mentioned in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467235#15 was due to
AccelDFS (although it seemed to work in previous versions).
Is the same AGP mode being used in all
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:39:16 +0100 Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:52 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
It appears that the screen corruption issue that I mentioned in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467235#15 was due
to AccelDFS (although
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 13:49 -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:39:16 +0100 Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:52 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
It appears that the screen corruption issue that I mentioned in
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:13:45 +0100 Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The default value of Option AGPMode may be different between
versions.
Indeed. My log from 1:6.7.x says: Using AGP 1x, while my log from
1:6.8.0 says: Using AGP 4x.
OK, I shall try with AGPMode 1 the next time I log
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:15:04 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, FWIW, I'm using xfwm4 with the compositing manager enabled.
Interesting. Does the problem go away if you disable compositing stuff
(or use another WM)?
I still have the image scaling problem when I disable
Hubert Chathi wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:15:04 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hubert Chathi wrote:
Done. Same problem with the bad image scaling. It appears that the
screen corruption issue that I mentioned in
Hubert Chathi wrote:
Option EnablePageFlipon
Option AGPFastWrite on
Option DynamicClocks on
Option BIOSHotkeys on
Option ColorTiling on
Option
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:32:06 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hubert Chathi wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:09:46 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it does not help, please send the corresponding Xorg.0.log.
OK, attached is the Xorg.0.log from
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:15:04 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hubert Chathi wrote:
Done. Same problem with the bad image scaling. It appears that the
screen corruption issue that I mentioned in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467235#15 was due
to AccelDFS
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:09:46 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it does not help, please send the corresponding Xorg.0.log.
OK, attached is the Xorg.0.log from 1:6.7.197-1
By the way, you have some useless/not-recommended options in your
xorg.conf, see below.
I commented most of
Hubert Chathi wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:09:46 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it does not help, please send the corresponding Xorg.0.log.
OK, attached is the Xorg.0.log from 1:6.7.197-1
Did you try with 1:6.8.0-1 as I requested? It has been in unstable for a
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 16:34 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
By the way, you have some useless/not-recommended options in your
xorg.conf, see below.
[...]
Yeah, but I was too lazy to weed through which ones were still current,
and they didn't seem to be causing any problems yet...
I'm
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:09:46 +0100 Brice Goglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you try 1:6.8.0-1 which entered unstable very recently ?
Ugh. It's even worse. :( Pretty much everything on-screen gets
corrupted.
See http://icons.uhoreg.ca/corrupted-screenlets.png, compared with
Hubert Chathi wrote:
By the way, those two screenshots were taken with 'Option RenderAccel
off', which fixes the scaling issue. So it seems that my guess is
correct, in that it's a bug in the Render acceleration.
Some Render acceleration support has been added to the driver recently.
It
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.197-1
Severity: normal
Symptoms: after upgrading the xserver-xorg-video-ati package, some
images are not scaled properly. For example, see
http://icons.uhoreg.ca/corrupt-scaling.png, compared to the screenshot
Hubert Chathi wrote:
Symptoms: after upgrading the xserver-xorg-video-ati package, some
images are not scaled properly. For example, see
http://icons.uhoreg.ca/corrupt-scaling.png, compared to the screenshot
http://www.screenlets.org/index.php/Clear_Weather (aside from the fact
that they had
21 matches
Mail list logo
