Tore Anderson a écrit :
* Marco d'Itri
Agreed. Can the libc maintainers please comment on this issue?
The next Debian release will be used in a period in which more and more
sites will deploy IPv6 and we must be sure to not make them less
reliable for the people adopting transition
* Marco d'Itri
Agreed. Can the libc maintainers please comment on this issue?
The next Debian release will be used in a period in which more and more
sites will deploy IPv6 and we must be sure to not make them less
reliable for the people adopting transition mechanisms.
Just adding some
Hi,
another update here: Ubuntu has also applied the patch to their libc
package, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/555210, and it will as I
understand it be part of their release that's due in a couple of weeks.
It would be great if Debian could also apply the patch. That is clearly
the
On Apr 17, Tore Anderson t...@fud.no wrote:
It would be great if Debian could also apply the patch. That is clearly
the behaviour that will serve end users the best.
Agreed. Can the libc maintainers please comment on this issue?
The next Debian release will be used in a period in which more
Just a little update here: Fedora has commited the change and it'll be
part of F13. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577626. I
have tested their patch (attached) and it works as expected.
It would really be fantastic if this could be commited to Debian as well!
Best regards,
--
Hi,
The current practise of scoping RFC 3484-addresses as site-local is
causing real operational problems on today's internet, and is
inhibiting the rollout of IPv6 on the content side:
Consider a setup where an end user has his computer on a LAN with RFC
1918-based private IPv4 addresses (using
Remi Denis-Courmont a écrit :
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-9
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
Rule 2 of the Destination Address Selection algorithm in RFC3484
specifies:
| Rule 2: Prefer matching scope.
| If Scope(DA) = Scope(Source(DA)) and Scope(DB) Scope(Source(DB)),
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-9
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
Rule 2 of the Destination Address Selection algorithm in RFC3484
specifies:
| Rule 2: Prefer matching scope.
| If Scope(DA) = Scope(Source(DA)) and Scope(DB) Scope(Source(DB)),
| then prefer DA. Similarly, if
8 matches
Mail list logo
