On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:47:21PM +0100, Steve Wolter wrote:
On the positive side, I've a small C file here that provides a library
interface that is binary-compatible to libhyphen. I'll write to the
maintainers of libhyphen, check with them on my implementation (which
even fixes libhyphen
Hello Guus, hello Bug,
Guus Sliepen wrote:
[...] Also, even if the libhyphen maintainers agree that your
version is better and can completely replace libhyphen, you should talk
with the maintainers/upstream of packages depending on libhypen, and see
if they might not use your library directly
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:12:16AM +0100, Steve Wolter wrote:
Great. I've packaged the libhyphenate (without any compatibility
interface), lintian-checked it and uploaded to:
http://swolter.sdf1.org/libhyphenate-debian.tar.gz
I see that it's a so-called native package. Since your library is
Guus Sliepen schrieb:
Hello Guus,
In contrast to the libhnj implementation, this one isn't broken.
I think you should remove this line from the package description.
[...]
There is no libhnj in sid anymore. There is libhyphen, which says it's a
modified version of libhnj based on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steve Wolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libhyphenate
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Steve Wolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://swolter.sdf1.org/software/libhyphenate.html
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:09:24AM +0100, Steve Wolter wrote:
[...]
In contrast to the libhnj implementation, this one isn't broken.
I think you should remove this line from the package description.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Guus,
Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:09:24AM +0100, Steve Wolter wrote:
[...]
In contrast to the libhnj implementation, this one isn't broken.
I think you should remove this line from the package description.
Thank you for the feedback. I added this line to make
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:18:28PM +0100, Steve Wolter wrote:
In contrast to the libhnj implementation, this one isn't broken.
I think you should remove this line from the package description.
Thank you for the feedback. I added this line to make sure that this
package is found when
8 matches
Mail list logo
