Bug#472252: xserver-xorg-video-ati: New AtomBIOS symbol names conflict with radeonhd driver

2008-03-24 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 12:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:44:25 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: * symbols conflicts, probably won't ever be fixed. uh? I don't think that should be the case. It shouldn't be too hard to mark internal symbols for each driver with

Bug#472252: xserver-xorg-video-ati: New AtomBIOS symbol names conflict with radeonhd driver

2008-03-23 Thread Brice Goglin
Tobias Diedrich wrote: This is a dual card configuration, one (X300) is using the ati driver, the other one (HD2600) is using the radeonhd driver, since the ati driver seems to be unable to handle it (segfaults). What kind of segfault is this? Can you show us the backtrace at the end

Bug#472252: xserver-xorg-video-ati: New AtomBIOS symbol names conflict with radeonhd driver

2008-03-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:44:25 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: * symbols conflicts, probably won't ever be fixed. uh? I don't think that should be the case. It shouldn't be too hard to mark internal symbols for each driver with _X_INTERNAL so they aren't exported, or build with -Bsymbolic or

Bug#472252: xserver-xorg-video-ati: New AtomBIOS symbol names conflict with radeonhd driver

2008-03-22 Thread Brice Goglin
Tobias Diedrich wrote: This is due to both drivers using the same AtomBIOS symbol names, but apparently incompatible versions of the code. I am not sure this will ever be fixed. Having 2 drivers for the same boards should just be a temporary solution. I don't care how radeonhd and ati get