On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:22:34PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> I do want to ensure that this has gone through well ahead of the
> transition freeze. Batching up such changes to the last moment makes
> releasing buster on time harder. Even though the chance of breaking
> something is
Hi Ted,
Thank you for your quick reply.
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:16:40AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> I just didn't think it was worth it to do an upload just with the
> priority change; my plan was to batch it with some other bug fixes in
> the next e2fsprogs minor release. Is there a rea
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:29:19AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 07:15:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Thus I ask Ted to drop the Essential flag now. I am attaching a patch
> > that replaces Essential: yes with XB-Important: yes.
>
> It seems t
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:29:19AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 07:15:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Thus I ask Ted to drop the Essential flag now. I am attaching a patch
> > that replaces Essential: yes with XB-Important: yes.
>
> It seems that you presently lack
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 decrease e2fsprogs' Priority: required
Control: tags -2 - patch
Control: block -2 by -1
Hi Ted,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 07:15:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Thus I ask Ted to drop the Essential flag now. I am attaching a patch
> that replaces Essential
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 08:42:16AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:34:20AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > Step 1: Essential: yes -> Important: yes
You know I've picked up the work to make this happen. To that end, I
inspected the archive and
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 08:42:16AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
[...]
> So what I am currently thinking might be a viable first step is to
> split out the translations for e2fsprogs and transition from
> Essential: yes to Essential: no, since there is no controversy over
> that step. We can then de
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:34:20AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Your 1) and 2) is what I initially called "step 1" and "step 2" to try
> to indicate they are to separate distincts steps.
>
> Step 1: Essential: yes -> Important: yes
> Step 2: Priority: required -> Priority: important
>
> >
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 05:40:20PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
[...]
> The normal Debian Docker images uses --variant=minbase. So changing
> e2fsprogs from Priority: required to Priority: important **will**
> change the Docker image. Ref:
>
> https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/contrib
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 03:08:32PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > step 1: Switch from Essential: yes to Important: yes
> > >
> > > This will not be much of a change in practise. Higher level tools
> > > like apt etc will still not want to uninstall the package, but
> > > you can now uninst
Hello Theodore Ts'o,
This mail dedicated to the potential confusion about Essentialness
and Priority.
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 06:51:11PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:21:57PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > I would like to breath some life into this bug report. I'v
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:15:24PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 01:22:52AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 20, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > > By the way, I was just taking a quick look, and e2fsprogs isn't the
> > > only offender in this regard. Out of a 20
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 01:22:52AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 20, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> > By the way, I was just taking a quick look, and e2fsprogs isn't the
> > only offender in this regard. Out of a 201 MB i386 minbase chroot, 33
> > MB, or over 16% can be found in /usr/share/local
On Aug 20, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> By the way, I was just taking a quick look, and e2fsprogs isn't the
> only offender in this regard. Out of a 201 MB i386 minbase chroot, 33
> MB, or over 16% can be found in /usr/share/locale. The next largest
> hierarchies under /usr/share are /usr/share/doc,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:21:57PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I would like to breath some life into this bug report. I've been
> collecting information/brainstorming-ideas about minimal debian
> installation (debootstrap --variant=minbase) on
> https://wiki.debian.org/BusterPriorityRequalif
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 06:51:11PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> There is one thing I can very quickly and easily do to to improve the
> minbase set. We can significantly reduce the size of e2fsprogs (by
> more half) by simply moving all of its locale files to a new package,
> e2fsprogs-l10n.
Hello!
I would like to breath some life into this bug report. I've been
collecting information/brainstorming-ideas about minimal debian
installation (debootstrap --variant=minbase) on
https://wiki.debian.org/BusterPriorityRequalification
The e2fsprogs was one of the packages that where questioned
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.40.8-2
Severity: wishlist
Looking at the large number of different file systems for Linux
I wonder whether it would be possible to split e2fsprogs to keep
the "essential" part separate from the file system specific part?
I am running Debian without ext[23] filesyste
18 matches
Mail list logo
