peter green wrote:
Since openjdk is now available in main, wouldn't that be the best
solution?
It would if it was in lenny but unfortunately openjdk was delayed hugely
by license issues :(. Now we have a situation where afiact openjdk will
only make it into lenny if one of the following
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:04:08PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
It's only a temporary situation that Azureus does not currently work
with a free Java VM. It very nearly works with GIJ -- and has worked
with GIJ in the past -- and there's the possibility of running it with
openjdk, as Peter
Since openjdk is now available in main, wouldn't that be the best solution?
It would if it was in lenny but unfortunately openjdk was delayed hugely
by license issues :(. Now we have a situation where afiact openjdk will
only make it into lenny if one of the following happens.
*The rc
It's only a temporary situation that Azureus does not currently work
with a free Java VM. It very nearly works with GIJ -- and has worked
with GIJ in the past -- and there's the possibility of running it with
openjdk, as Peter mentioned.
Cheers,
Shaun
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:18 PM, peter green
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.0+0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The package seems to require Sun Java as it stated in README.txt. I gave
up with trying to run it on free VM's available in Debian etch.
In addition, the azureus wrapper expects java in the path, which is
The package seems to require Sun Java as it stated in README.txt. I gave
up with trying to run it on free VM's available in Debian etch.
It would appear that way
In addition, the azureus wrapper expects java in the path, which is
available only with Sun Java package installed.
Afaict this is
6 matches
Mail list logo
