#readahead-list (1:1.20060421.1016-5) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Allow to run in the background, see README.Debian (Closes: #481369)
#
package readahead-list readahead
tags 481369 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:49:18PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:53:33
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:53:33 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Running it in the background would mean you were seeking the disk all
over the shop,
On a solid state disk (CompactFlash, USB stick or otherwise), there is no
overhead due to seeking. For rotating disks the kernel uses an elevator
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 18:09 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 15.05.2008, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Alberto:
Since version 1:0.20050517.0220-0ubuntu4, readahead runs in the
foreground, not the background, in order to avoid i/o concurrency
(which is slow).
Not true. It runs
[Alberto]
I send attached both graphs as you suggested
[bootchartioniced.png (image/png, inline)]
[bootchartnotioniced.png (image/png, inline)]
The graphs look strange. Are you sure the profiling worked as it
should? The readahead run do not seem to have loaded all the files
needed by the
package: readahead
version: 1.20060421.1016-3
severity: wishlist
Since version 1:0.20050517.0220-0ubuntu4, readahead runs in the
foreground, not the background, in order to avoid i/o concurrency
(which is slow).
A better approach: run with the ionice wrapper (not available at
time of
Am Donnerstag, den 15.05.2008, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Alberto:
package: readahead
version: 1.20060421.1016-3
severity: wishlist
Since version 1:0.20050517.0220-0ubuntu4, readahead runs in the
foreground, not the background, in order to avoid i/o concurrency
(which is slow).
A better
6 matches
Mail list logo
