Hello,
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 07:33 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Franklin PIAT]
Yep, it's less intrusive, however, ionice -p doesn't seems to be
propagated to existing child process :
I know, and that is OK, as long as it is executed early in the script,
before child processes are
[Franklin Piat]
popularity-contest's cronjob (/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest)
should use ionice in order to be [even] less intrusive.
Make sense to me.
I've attached a simple patch.
I suspect adding something like this to the script is less intrusive:
ionice -c2 -p $$ /dev/null 21 ||
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Franklin Piat]
popularity-contest's cronjob (/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest)
should use ionice in order to be [even] less intrusive.
Make sense to me.
I've attached a simple patch.
I suspect adding something
Hi Petter,
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 19:08 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Franklin Piat]
popularity-contest's cronjob (/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest)
should use ionice...
I suspect adding something like this to the script is less intrusive:
ionice -c2 -p $$ /dev/null 21 || true
Hello,
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 19:42 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Franklin Piat]
popularity-contest's cronjob (/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest)
should use ionice in order to be [even] less intrusive.
Personnally, I
[Franklin PIAT]
Yep, it's less intrusive, however, ionice -p doesn't seems to be
propagated to existing child process :
I know, and that is OK, as long as it is executed early in the script,
before child processes are forked.
It change the nice level on the script process. Btw, why did you
Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.45
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
popularity-contest's cronjob (/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest)
should use ionice in order to be [even] less intrusive.
I've attached a simple patch.
Franklin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT
7 matches
Mail list logo
