Bug#492084: atitvout: should this package be removed?

2008-08-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:40:01PM +0200, Philippe Coval wrote: Hi, I'll try to fix this bug, see comments bellow * Fairly low popcon. 242 * Upstream has been dead since 2004. yes but It worked as expected since * RC Buggy. I'll see If I can find a workaround, actually the problem is

Bug#492084: atitvout: should this package be removed?

2008-07-23 Thread Barry deFreese
Package: atitvout Version: 0.4-12 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Fairly low popcon. * Upstream has been dead since 2004. * RC

Bug#492084: atitvout: should this package be removed?

2008-07-23 Thread Philippe Coval
Hi, I'll try to fix this bug, see comments bellow * Fairly low popcon. 242 * Upstream has been dead since 2004. yes but It worked as expected since * RC Buggy. I'll see If I can find a workaround, actually the problem is not in ativout itself but in lrmi which is also noticed in

Bug#492084: atitvout: should this package be removed?

2008-07-23 Thread peter green
BTW, would it be a good idea to package lrmi appart ? In the short term IMO no. The library freeze is already in place and the full freeze is imminent. So if you want to see the package in lenny you don't want to be making major structural changes right now. In the long term IMO it depends