Bug#492519: fixed in vim 2:7.2c.000-1
Hi James, On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:17:07PM +, James Vega wrote: * runtime/autoload/netrw.vim: Fix deletion of incorrect file in wide display listing. Using Jan Minář's patch from the vim-dev list. (Closes: #492519) his bug is still open in Lenny. Do you agree on the serious severity of this bug? If so, could the mentioned fix please be backported to Lenny? Kind regards, Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#492519: fixed in vim 2:7.2c.000-1
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:17:57PM -0300, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi James, On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:17:07PM +, James Vega wrote: * runtime/autoload/netrw.vim: Fix deletion of incorrect file in wide display listing. Using Jan Minář's patch from the vim-dev list. (Closes: #492519) his bug is still open in Lenny. Do you agree on the serious severity of this bug? If so, could the mentioned fix please be backported to Lenny? I'm a little skeptical about the severity since the user is prompted to confirm the deletion of the file and the prompt lists the actual file it is going to delete. I did want to request a freeze exception for the 7.2 final release (which I'm working on now) as there were many security-related fixes made in 7.2 as well as improvements to some of the fixes that are present in 7.1.314-3. I realize though that this exception will probably be met with resistance since it's a new upstream release. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#492519: fixed in vim 2:7.2c.000-1
severity 492519 important thanks On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:58:49PM -0400, James Vega wrote: I'm a little skeptical about the severity since the user is prompted to confirm the deletion of the file and the prompt lists the actual file it is going to delete. ACK. Wrt to the whole of vim I don't think it warrants a RC bug. Maybe even important is inflated, but well... I did want to request a freeze exception for the 7.2 final release (which I'm working on now) as there were many security-related fixes made in 7.2 as well as improvements to some of the fixes that are present in 7.1.314-3. I realize though that this exception will probably be met with resistance since it's a new upstream release. You'll have to contact d-release timely. I suppose it will be hard, though. Kind regards, Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature