Bug#492661: developers-reference: Bogus phrasing about .orig.tar.gz repackaging.

2009-01-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
tags 492661 + pending thanks On 28/07/08 at 02:04 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.0 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, while discussing repackaging upstream sources with Stuart, he noticed that the following phrasing is a bit bogus, from §6.7.8.2:

Bug#492661: developers-reference: Bogus phrasing about .orig.tar.gz repackaging.

2009-01-22 Thread Stuart Prescott
Hi all, -emphasis role=strongmust/emphasis contain detailed information how the -repackaged source was obtained, and how this can be reproduced in the +emphasis role=strongmust/emphasis be documented. Detailed information on how the +repackaged source was obtained, and on how this can be

Bug#492661: developers-reference: Bogus phrasing about .orig.tar.gz repackaging.

2009-01-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/01/09 at 00:30 +, Stuart Prescott wrote: Hi all, -emphasis role=strongmust/emphasis contain detailed information how the -repackaged source was obtained, and how this can be reproduced in the +emphasis role=strongmust/emphasis be documented. Detailed information on how

Bug#492661: developers-reference: Bogus phrasing about .orig.tar.gz repackaging.

2008-07-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.0 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, while discussing repackaging upstream sources with Stuart, he noticed that the following phrasing is a bit bogus, from §6.7.8.2: | A repackaged .orig.tar.gz | | 1. must contain detailed information how the repackaged