Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-08-05 Thread Harald Braumann
Hi, On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:09:12 -0700 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com wrote: tag 493090 wontfix quit I think that this request is unreasonable. Why is it unreasonable to not want useless dependencies? I don't see what the problem here is. gconf doesn't do anything evil, I'm not going

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-08-05 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi! On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:56:06AM +0200, Harald Braumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:09:12 -0700 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com wrote: tag 493090 wontfix quit I think that this request is unreasonable. Why is it unreasonable to not want useless dependencies?

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-08-05 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com [090805 10:23]: or is the reason just that you are anti-GNOME? Could you please stop that If you question what we do you are against us? If you troll everbody until they have a hate for GNOME you might end up with everybody either loving what GNOMES does or

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-08-05 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi, On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:28:28AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com [090805 10:23]: or is the reason just that you are anti-GNOME? Could you please stop that If you question what we do you are against us? If you troll everbody until they have a hate for

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-08-05 Thread Harald Braumann
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:14:54 -0700 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:56:06AM +0200, Harald Braumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:09:12 -0700 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com wrote: tag 493090 wontfix quit I think that this

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-08-04 Thread Ryan Niebur
tag 493090 wontfix quit I think that this request is unreasonable. I don't see what the problem here is. gconf doesn't do anything evil, and it's not really that big. just having it installed shouldn't hurt. also, there are many other packages which depend on gconf. why don't you want wx to

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-05-16 Thread ti-brin des bois
2009/5/13 Lutz Lehmann llehm...@math.hu-berlin.de: Hi, sorry, I did'nt state it clearly enough. From what I read, the wx mediacontrol widgets that provide gstreamer support to the wx toolkit were constructed from the beginning to get their options from gconf. In one of the links of my last

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-05-13 Thread Lutz Lehmann
ti-brin des bois wrote: I'm not sure that the gconf dependency is added by gstreamer. I'm an Xfce user and since Xfce 4.6, the mixer(xfce4-mixer) and the CD/DVD burner application(Xfburn) having the same gstreamer dependencies that wxgtk 2.8, don't depend on gconf.

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2009-05-12 Thread ti-brin des bois
Please consider removing all gstreamer dependencies or creating a wxmedia package that solely contains the dependencies on gstreamer and gconf2. I'm not sure that the gconf dependency is added by gstreamer. I'm an Xfce user and since Xfce 4.6, the mixer(xfce4-mixer) and the CD/DVD burner

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2008-11-02 Thread ti-brin des bois
This bug should be in a higher priority and solved before the release of Lenny. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#493090: libwxgtk2.8-0: unwanted dependency on libgconf

2008-07-31 Thread Erwan David
Package: libwxgtk2.8-0 Version: 2.8.7.1-1 Severity: normal Upstream does not depend on libgconf, package depnds on it. Such gratuitous dependencies tend to clobber machines with unwanted programs leading to ressource leak (and gconf is very bad at staying here when not needed nor wanted). --