On Sb, 14 iun 14, 13:32:28, Beatrice Torracca wrote:
I'd like to bring this subject to some attention again because I think
the problem still stands. There are 2 (apparently, at the moment)
conflicting issues:
- package descriptions (all the texlive-* ones) are a nightmare to
translate
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
This issue is not texlive specific, so I'd rather suggest the DDTP to
treat formated list items the same as paragraphs. Then all packages
using this will benefit from the solution, possibly after a one-time
adjusting of the list.
I agree, but for
Hi,
Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Hi Beatrice, hi Joe,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Joe Dalton wrote:
I have to agree on this one.
perhaps a compromise could be reach, so at least lines with the same letter
(a, b, c etc.) could be in one section.
Hmm, as far as I understand
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Holger Wansing wrote:
What about simply listing the package names, without their
description ...
Not good - apt-cache search foobar would not help here.
That *is* a very useful feature to search for particular CTAN
packages without having to know the title.
Norbert
--
Den lør 14/6/14 skrev Beatrice Torracca beatri...@libero.it:
Emne: Re: Bug#493778: Insanely long package description for texlive-latex-extra
Til: debian-i...@lists.debian.org
Cc: 493...@bugs.debian.org
Dato: lørdag 14. juni 2014 13.32
On Wednesday 13 April 2011, at 23:18
+0200
Hi Beatrice, hi Joe,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Joe Dalton wrote:
I have to agree on this one.
perhaps a compromise could be reach, so at least lines with the same letter
(a, b, c etc.) could be in one section.
Hmm, as far as I understand Beatrice's explanations, this wouldn't
help a lot, since
On Wednesday 13 April 2011, at 23:18 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Davide Prina davide.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/04/2011 01:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never
Davide Prina davide.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/04/2011 01:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
Quoting Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at):
On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
But it is the list of packages
On 07/04/2011 01:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
But it is the list of packages included, and
I agree with Holger Wansing, who reported this bug about 3 years
ago. This package has a way too long description.
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
Please move that crazy
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:24:00PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I agree with Holger Wansing, who reported this bug about 3 years
ago. This package has a way too long description.
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same
On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
But it is the list of packages included, and as Hauke said, the main
aim is to allow
13 matches
Mail list logo
