On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recommend would mean swfdec-mozilla would not be installed by default
since tasksel does not honor recommends.
Why not fix tasksel ? ;-)
This may be done post-lenny, but it has strong implications on the size
of
Le lundi 01 septembre 2008 à 16:29 -0300, Margarita Manterola a écrit :
Alright, I understand the problem. However, using a depends when
it's not really something that is depended on (all browsers can
perfectly work without a flash player) breaks the definition of the
Depends field.
gnome is
Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 07:35 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
It is well known and unfortunate that mozilla lacks a plugin manager,
but this shouldn’t prevent a metapackage to provide a *complete*
environment.
Would it need exactly swfdec-mozilla, or any flash playing plugin
(like the
Le mercredi 06 août 2008 à 08:11 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
Package: gnome
Version: 1:2.22.2~3
Severity: normal
Hi.
I can't understand the rationale here that gnome package depends on
swfdec-mozilla, and not swfdec-gnome.
gnome-desktop-environment (which provides the official GNOME
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mercredi 06 août 2008 à 08:11 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
Hi.
I can't understand the rationale here that gnome package depends on
swfdec-mozilla, and not swfdec-gnome.
gnome-desktop-environment (which provides the official GNOME desktop,
Package: gnome
Version: 1:2.22.2~3
Severity: normal
Hi.
I can't understand the rationale here that gnome package depends on
swfdec-mozilla, and not swfdec-gnome.
Is this just a typo ?
In any case, forcing the use of one flash decoder inside the web browser
(used outside of gnome too) doesn't
6 matches
Mail list logo
