Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional

2009-03-28 Thread Tim Abbott
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Riku Voipio wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:45:02PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote: Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) I hope you'll understand that I prioritized getting sagemath into Debian over getting

Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional

2009-02-10 Thread Riku Voipio
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:45:02PM -0500, Tim Abbott wrote: Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) I hope you'll understand that I prioritized getting sagemath into Debian over getting its dependencies working on all architectures.

Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional

2009-02-09 Thread Riku Voipio
user debian-...@lists.debian.org usertag 495000 eabi thanks Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional

2009-02-09 Thread Tim Abbott
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Riku Voipio wrote: user debian-...@lists.debian.org usertag 495000 eabi thanks Any news on this? It is blocking arrival of sagemath on several architectures (alpha, arm*) I hope you'll understand that I prioritized getting sagemath into Debian over getting its

Bug#495000: please consider making libatlas-base-dev optional

2008-08-13 Thread Riku Voipio
Package: iml Version: 1.0.3-1 Severity: wishlist Some platforms[1] are missing atlas, and thus can't compile ilm. However, it looks like iml is not including any atlas_* headers, only cblas.h, which is provided by libblas-dev. Please allow building agains libbblas-dev on platforms where atlas