Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
3) is not a problem, don't worry about that.
what i wanted from you was a statement for 2).
I have sent a mail to the original developers. I'll let you know once they
answer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
I have sent a mail to the original developers. I'll let you know once they
answer.
thank you.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:
3) The issue with the libraries. Their names are really too generic and
they really aren't packaged as proper shared libraries, so you can't
put them into /usr/lib.
I think you can change install.cmake so that
SET(LIBDIR lib[64])
becomes
SET(LIBDIR lib[64]/cuneiform)
CMake sets
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
3) The issue with the libraries. Their names are really too generic and
they really aren't packaged as proper shared libraries, so you can't
put them into /usr/lib.
I think you can change install.cmake so that
SET(LIBDIR lib[64])
becomes
SET(LIBDIR
Hi.
Lets not further leave this package in limbo. The current situation is
as follows:
1) REJECT for missing copyright holders in debian/copyright. That should
be easily fixable.
2) It would be interesting to know where those .dat files come from and
whether there exists some kind of
Hi Jussi,
2) It would be interesting to know where those .dat files come from and
whether there exists some kind of source for them. In the package itself
I could not find any information about that.
do you have any information about this?
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel
6 matches
Mail list logo
