Bug#496873: ITP: pure -- functional programming language based on term rewriting

2008-08-30 Thread David Baird
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 07:17 +, dhbaird wrote: * Package name: pure I can't help thinking that 'pure-lang' would be a much better package name rather than using such a common word that has multiple meanings.

Bug#496873: ITP: pure -- functional programming language based on term rewriting

2008-08-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 02:01 -0600, David Baird wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 07:17 +, dhbaird wrote: * Package name: pure I can't help thinking that 'pure-lang' would be a much better package name rather than

Bug#496873: ITP: pure -- functional programming language based on term rewriting

2008-08-28 Thread dhbaird
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: pure Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : Albert Gräf Dr.Graef at t-online.de * URL : http://pure-lang.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: C, C++, LLVM Description :

Bug#496873: ITP: pure -- functional programming language based on term rewriting

2008-08-28 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 07:17 +, dhbaird wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: pure I can't help thinking that 'pure-lang' would be a much better package name rather than using such a common word that has multiple meanings. Version