On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 07:17 +, dhbaird wrote:
* Package name: pure
I can't help thinking that 'pure-lang' would be a much better package
name rather than using such a common word that has multiple meanings.
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 02:01 -0600, David Baird wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 07:17 +, dhbaird wrote:
* Package name: pure
I can't help thinking that 'pure-lang' would be a much better package
name rather than
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pure
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Albert Gräf Dr.Graef at t-online.de
* URL : http://pure-lang.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: C, C++, LLVM
Description :
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 07:17 +, dhbaird wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pure
I can't help thinking that 'pure-lang' would be a much better package
name rather than using such a common word that has multiple meanings.
Version
4 matches
Mail list logo