On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 02:21 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:37:54AM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:25, Raphael Geissert
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> > >> the check for embedded prototype javacsript library
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:37:54AM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:25, Raphael Geissert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> >> the check for embedded prototype javacsript library is prone to many
> >> false positives, as "prototype" is a pretty com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:25, Raphael Geissert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
>
>> Package: lintian
>> Version: 1.24.4
>> Severity: important
>>
>> the check for embedded prototype javacsript library is prone to many
>> false positives, as "prototype" is a pretty common word
Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.24.4
> Severity: important
>
> the check for embedded prototype javacsript library is prone to many
> false positives, as "prototype" is a pretty common word in js-space,
> and also that it can be common for JavaScript files, using such lib
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 00:51 +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.24.4
> Severity: important
>
> the check for embedded prototype javacsript library is prone to many
> false positives, as "prototype" is a pretty common word in js-space,
> and also that it can be common fo
Package: lintian
Version: 1.24.4
Severity: important
the check for embedded prototype javacsript library is prone to many
false positives, as "prototype" is a pretty common word in js-space,
and also that it can be common for JavaScript files, using such library
to be called libfoo-prototype.js e
6 matches
Mail list logo
