On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:34:38PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
So we are absolutely on the same side here. :)
Luckily :), even more so because I'm still jetlag-ed, and interpreting
the first part of your reply would have been too hard right now :)
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
--
Stefano
Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2008, 07:55 +1100 schrieb Mark Purcell:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 08:23:47 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:36:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
In my opinion, packages.d.o is the right place for this (rather than the
PTS) because it is more
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:49:20PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
On the contrary, I rather think of packages.debian.org as the end
user's view and it might be confusing to have the patch-tracking linked
from there. But then, that might be just me and I hope I won't get
I guess you meant
Hi!
* Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-21 19:26:13 CEST]:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:49:20PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
On the contrary, I rather think of packages.debian.org as the end
user's view and it might be confusing to have the patch-tracking linked
from
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 08:23:47 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:36:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
In my opinion, packages.d.o is the right place for this (rather than the
PTS) because it is more directed at users and people outside Debian.
Well, I do want to have
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:36:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
It would be nice if packages.debian.org/sid/foo linked to
patch-tracking.debian.net/package/foo/1.2.3-4
In my opinion, packages.d.o is the right place for this (rather than the
PTS) because it is more directed at users and people
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 09:43 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
What exactly do you think the machine-parsable index would be needed
for?
I assumed that you would need a machine-parsable index of all the
packages that have patches. I realise now that isn't the case.
The only reason I can think
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:28:51 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
What exactly do you think the machine-parsable index would be needed
for?
The only reason I can think you would want the index is if you want to
differentiate between packages with just packaging added, packages with
changes outside
clone 497410 -1
reassign -1 qa.debian.org
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag -1 + pts
thanks
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:36:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
In my opinion, packages.d.o is the right place for this (rather than the
PTS) because it is more directed at users and people outside Debian.
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be nice if packages.debian.org/sid/foo linked to
patch-tracking.debian.net/package/foo/1.2.3-4
In my opinion, packages.d.o is the right place for this (rather than the
PTS) because it is more directed at users
tags 497410 moreinfo
thanks
hiya,
On Monday 01 September 2008 05:36:06 pm Paul Wise wrote:
There does not appear to be a machine-parsable index of all the packages
with patches and their versions, would this be possible to add Sean?
it should be pretty straightforward to add something like
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 21:19 +0200, sean finney wrote:
it could be done on a per-package basis, as well as a single massive index
file, and it could be formatted in any number of ways (csv, rfc822-ish,
xml...) . so... i'll need a little more info on *how* you'd like this
implemented before
12 matches
Mail list logo
