Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
In #354355 (the etch sympa-drama bug), Stefan Hornburg refused several
times to consider co-maintainance for sympa. I'm not sure if Jean
Charles Delepine is still interested in co-maintaining it, but maybe we
should try to convince
Hi,
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
initial maintainer response will investigate, also happened to people
at the last
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
initial
I'm another Olivier, but I can provide some feedback still.
As far as we're concerned all reported bugs, regarding insecure usage of
tmp, have been fixed in Sympa. It's now up to the Debian maintainer to
apply the patches to the Debian package.
If we've missed something, please let us
I am a dedicated sympa user too -- it would be a real shame if this
couldn't be brough up to date.
-A
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 13:36 +0200, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about
Hi Janusz, Olivier,
thanks for taking interest in the Debian packaging of sympa.
Olivier Salaün wrote:
As far as we're concerned all reported bugs, regarding insecure usage of
tmp, have been fixed in Sympa. It's now up to the Debian maintainer to
apply the patches to the Debian package.
Yeah,
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
initial maintainer response will investigate, also
On 03/10/08 at 15:21 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 12:43 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
It does not seem to have reverse dependencies. There are a few users
(double digit popcon), but not exceedingly many.
As it is on the servers, I assume a single
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 03/10/08 at 15:21 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 12:43 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
It does not seem to have reverse dependencies. There are a few users
(double digit popcon), but not exceedingly many.
As it is on the servers, I assume
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
In #354355 (the etch sympa-drama bug), Stefan Hornburg refused several
times to consider co-maintainance for sympa. I'm not sure if Jean
Charles Delepine is still interested in co-maintaining it, but maybe we
should try to
Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 16:11 +0200, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) a
écrit :
I find it annoying that after the sympa-drama before the etch release,
we are now likely to run into another sympa-drama. Sympa is not an
unmaintained software package: upstream is active, responsive and AFAIK
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:43:39PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
initial maintainer
12 matches
Mail list logo
