> I really don't know why, it's also not documented in the changelog.
> Philipp, do you know something about that change?
> Maybe dropping that patch from 2.0.869.2-2.1 would have fixed booting
> from iscsi as well, but now we already have 2.0.870-rc3 in unstable...
No, that doesn't make sense t
Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 10:27 +0100 schrieb Chris Lamb:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > Something went wrong with this upload:
> [..]
> > tags 499508 +pending
>
> So, version.h wasn't up-to-date in the new tarball?
It was, but the Debian diff reverted the change. This is from your last
upload
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Something went wrong with this upload:
[..]
> tags 499508 +pending
So, version.h wasn't up-to-date in the new tarball? Curious. Good spot
anyway, and thanks for uploading this extra fix.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [EMAIL PR
Found: 2.0.870~rc3-0.1
Am Dienstag, den 30.09.2008, 21:36 + schrieb Debian BTS:
> open-iscsi (2.0.870~rc3-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * New upstream release
> - Adds support for Linux 2.6.26 (Closes: #499508)
> * Fix ">&" redirection bashism in open-is
4 matches
Mail list logo