On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:08:43AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 20:52 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
Dave Beckett wrote:
The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do
any cairo work today.
[…]
Cc-ed debian-boot to be sure it does no
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have rebuilt cdebconf with these packages after updating the
Build-Depends and removing the special dh_shlibdeps case for
cdebconf-gtk-udeb. Building and testing an installer with the resulting
udebs lead to a successful installation.
Using the
Hi,
I read in #499662 that you propose to
remove /usr/lib/libcairo-directfb/lib/libcairo.so.* and only rely on the
libcairo-directfb.so.* library. However I’m afraid this is going to
break the GTK+ DirectFB build. Currently, it is very hackish, and relies
on the availability of those files in
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 14:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
I read in #499662 that you propose to
remove /usr/lib/libcairo-directfb/lib/libcairo.so.* and only rely on the
libcairo-directfb.so.* library.
Sort of - certainly public symbols in a /usr/lib/lib*/ directory is a
bad idea as
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 15:21 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
The reason is that pangocairo can link to each of the two cairo
libraries, and therefore we don’t rebuild it for the DirectFB version.
Looking ahead to Squeeze, would it be possible to implement the same
solution for pango and
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:45:37 +0200
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 15:21 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
Can we not separate the entire DirectFB question into dedicated packages
using predictable filenames and directories - just as if these were
actually
tag 499662 + patch
thanks
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 16:38 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
This would really be the very same version of the library, with more
symbols. Nothing can break more than when you simply upgrade the library
to a new version.
Except that the diversion can also be
The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do
any cairo work today.
One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package
by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian
is really just the installer, so limiting the packages for that
was a
Dave Beckett wrote:
The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do
any cairo work today.
One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package
by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian
is really just the installer, so limiting the
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Beckett wrote:
The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do
any cairo work today.
One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package
by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian
is really
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 20:52 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
Dave Beckett wrote:
The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do
any cairo work today.
One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package
by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The
11 matches
Mail list logo
