On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:59:25AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
I'm of the opinion that there needs to be a way for packages to register
generated files as belonging to them with dpkg. Packages would be
expected to register ucf/etc-generated configuration files, alternatives
and any files and
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:11:21PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Package: cruft
Version: 0.9.11
Severity: wishlist
Currently cruft reports configuration files managed by ucf as cruft. It
would be nice if cruft knew about the ucf database and checked it for
missing files and used it to explain
On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 09:22 +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Can you point me at an example reported file and package which owns it,
so that I can actually learn how ucf works? I have a very vague idea of
how it does what it does...
gpm and /etc/gpm.conf
--
bye,
pabs
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 06:40:48PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 09:22 +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Can you point me at an example reported file and package which owns it,
so that I can actually learn how ucf works? I have a very vague idea of
how it does what it does...
I'm of the opinion that there needs to be a way for packages to register
generated files as belonging to them with dpkg. Packages would be
expected to register ucf/etc-generated configuration files, alternatives
and any files and directories created by their maintainer scripts.
cruft could then
Package: cruft
Version: 0.9.11
Severity: wishlist
Currently cruft reports configuration files managed by ucf as cruft. It
would be nice if cruft knew about the ucf database and checked it for
missing files and used it to explain files that are otherwise
unexplained by other explain scripts.
6 matches
Mail list logo
