Bug#500285: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#500285: no patch necessary for building against 2.6.27

2008-10-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-10-20 22:34 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Indeed, it doesn't build correctly. But I didn't notice that, because the nvidia-kernel-source package hides the problem by ignoring make errors and reusing a previously built

Bug#500285: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#500285: no patch necessary for building against 2.6.27

2008-10-21 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:25:25AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2008-10-20 22:34 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Indeed, it doesn't build correctly. But I didn't notice that, because the nvidia-kernel-source package hides the

Bug#501987: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#500285: no patch necessary for building against 2.6.27

2008-10-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-10-21 20:58 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote: make-kpkg has a modules_clean target. Does using that before the build help? Nope, same problem. If not, then I suspect there is a problem with the cleaning target in the nvidia package we have to figure out. All I can say that make-kpkg

Bug#500285: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#500285: no patch necessary for building against 2.6.27

2008-10-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Indeed, it doesn't build correctly. But I didn't notice that, because the nvidia-kernel-source package hides the problem by ignoring make errors and reusing a previously built nvidia.ko for the nvidia-kernel-2.6.* package. I'll

Bug#500285: no patch necessary for building against 2.6.27

2008-10-12 Thread Clemens Buchacher
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:03:34PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: the nvidia kernel module 173.14.09-5 built fine against the just released kernel 2.6.27. Does this include any patches I'm not aware of? 173.14.09-5 contains the file nv-linux.h, which includes asm/semaphore.h. This file does not

Bug#500285: no patch necessary for building against 2.6.27

2008-10-12 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-10-12 12:51 +0200, Clemens Buchacher wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:03:34PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: the nvidia kernel module 173.14.09-5 built fine against the just released kernel 2.6.27. Does this include any patches I'm not aware of? 173.14.09-5 contains the file

Bug#500285: no patch necessary for building against 2.6.27

2008-10-10 Thread Sven Joachim
Hi, the nvidia kernel module 173.14.09-5 built fine against the just released kernel 2.6.27. So it seems the bug can be closed without further action. :-) Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]