This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri said:
On Oct 04, Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does signing a mail tell me something about the origin that the IP layer
doesn't already tell me much more cheaply?
You are missing the point: maintaining reputation data associated to IP
On Oct 05, Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are missing the point: maintaining reputation data associated to IP
addresses is not cheap at all nor very reliable, because IP addresses
tend to change and mail to be forwarded.
DK/DKIM (and partially SPF) solve these problems by
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri said:
This is why your experience is not relevant.
It's so cute when you think you're important. But really, a bug report
isn't all that useful a place to debate the merits of this. Why don't
you head over to SPAM-L or mailop and let them know how
On Oct 04, Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does signing a mail tell me something about the origin that the IP layer
doesn't already tell me much more cheaply?
You are missing the point: maintaining reputation data associated to IP
addresses is not cheap at all nor very reliable, because
Does signing a mail tell me something about the origin that the IP layer
doesn't already tell me much more cheaply?
Granted, not every subscriber runs their own mail server, but enough do
that it's trivial to verify that a given mail with a given hash sum came
from the list servers.
I'm
5 matches
Mail list logo
