fixed 502497 1.5.19-1
thanks
Please upgrade to 1.5.19-1, the mbox(5) manpage now
correctly reports that the date format is asctime().
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 07:32:05PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-10-21 10:25:15, schrieb Trent W. Buck:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
And where is the problem now?
The date-time format described in RFC2822 3.3
IS:
Fri Jun 23 02:56:55 2000
Am 2008-10-21 10:25:15, schrieb Trent W. Buck:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
And where is the problem now?
The date-time format described in RFC2822 3.3
IS:
Fri Jun 23 02:56:55 2000
I don't see how that matches the grammar provided by RFC
And where is the problem now?
The date-time format described in RFC2822 3.3
IS:
Fri Jun 23 02:56:55 2000
Am 2008-10-17 14:08:32, schrieb Trent W. Buck:
Yet actually attempting to use this format results in mutt reporting
an empty mailbox.
What do you mean, with: 'pty mailbox'?
I have
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
And where is the problem now?
The date-time format described in RFC2822 3.3
IS:
Fri Jun 23 02:56:55 2000
I don't see how that matches the grammar provided by RFC 2822 ยง3.3:
date-time = [ day-of-week ,
tags 502497 fixed-upstream upstream
thanks
Re: Trent W. Buck 2008-10-17 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The good folk of Freenode's #mutt had this to say:
fmg the date in From_ is always asctime format
fmg debian man page is misleading you, take:
http://www.qmail.org/qmail-manual-html/man5/mbox.html
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.18-4
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/man/man5/mbox.5.gz
The mbox(5) manpage says
The date [if the From_ line] is expected to be date-time as
defined in RFC2822 3.3.
Yet actually attempting to use this format results in mutt reporting
an empty mailbox. The
7 matches
Mail list logo
