* eModul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-22 22:31]:
Package: sup-mail
Copying the maintainer since the package is still in NEW.
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: minor
As I realized the usage description of the sup-mail package shows:
Usage:
sup [options]
and the 'man 1 sup-mail' as well:
Excerpts from Martin Michlmayr's message of Thu Oct 23 02:59:29 -0400 2008:
Copying the maintainer since the package is still in NEW.
Thanks. (Has this always been the case? A quick search of the bugs.debian.org
metapackage doesn't seem to show anything filed about bugs not going to
maintainers
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:52:39PM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
Excerpts from Martin Michlmayr's message of Thu Oct 23 02:59:29 -0400 2008:
Copying the maintainer since the package is still in NEW.
Thanks. (Has this always been the case? A quick search of the bugs.debian.org
metapackage
* Decklin Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-23 12:52]:
Thanks. (Has this always been the case? A quick search of the bugs.debian.org
metapackage doesn't seem to show anything filed about bugs not going to
maintainers for still-NEW packages.)
Yeah, it has always been like this. The BTS uses
Package: sup-mail
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: minor
As I realized the usage description of the sup-mail package shows:
Usage:
sup [options]
and the 'man 1 sup-mail' as well:
SYNOPSIS
sup [options]
But the package itself is used by the command 'sup-mail'. If the
name of the package
5 matches
Mail list logo