Bug#503142: usage description and man page show command 'sup' instead of 'sup-mail'

2008-10-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* eModul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-22 22:31]: Package: sup-mail Copying the maintainer since the package is still in NEW. Version: 0.6-1 Severity: minor As I realized the usage description of the sup-mail package shows: Usage: sup [options] and the 'man 1 sup-mail' as well:

Bug#503142: usage description and man page show command 'sup' instead of 'sup-mail'

2008-10-23 Thread Decklin Foster
Excerpts from Martin Michlmayr's message of Thu Oct 23 02:59:29 -0400 2008: Copying the maintainer since the package is still in NEW. Thanks. (Has this always been the case? A quick search of the bugs.debian.org metapackage doesn't seem to show anything filed about bugs not going to maintainers

Bug#503142: usage description and man page show command 'sup' instead of 'sup-mail'

2008-10-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:52:39PM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Excerpts from Martin Michlmayr's message of Thu Oct 23 02:59:29 -0400 2008: Copying the maintainer since the package is still in NEW. Thanks. (Has this always been the case? A quick search of the bugs.debian.org metapackage

Bug#503142: usage description and man page show command 'sup' instead of 'sup-mail'

2008-10-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Decklin Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-23 12:52]: Thanks. (Has this always been the case? A quick search of the bugs.debian.org metapackage doesn't seem to show anything filed about bugs not going to maintainers for still-NEW packages.) Yeah, it has always been like this. The BTS uses

Bug#503142: usage description and man page show command 'sup' instead of 'sup-mail'

2008-10-22 Thread eModul
Package: sup-mail Version: 0.6-1 Severity: minor As I realized the usage description of the sup-mail package shows: Usage: sup [options] and the 'man 1 sup-mail' as well: SYNOPSIS sup [options] But the package itself is used by the command 'sup-mail'. If the name of the package