Bug#512079: package structure and signature updates

2009-08-07 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi Javier. Sorry for the late reply. On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:04 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:46:17AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Another thing is that many files are not listed as being part of the package, e.g.

Bug#512079: package structure and signature updates

2009-06-12 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:46:17AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Another thing is that many files are not listed as being part of the package, e.g. /etc/tiger/tigerrc. Which files? $ dpkg -L tiger |grep tiger/tigerrc /etc/tiger/tigerrc Uhm strange,.. this is not in the

Bug#512079: package structure and signature updates

2009-01-31 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi Javier. Sorry for that long delay. On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 12:41 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: Why do you think these should be in /var/? These are only updated through new packages, Are they? I mean a user can update them by invoking tiger with -G if I recall correctly. And I

Bug#512079: package structure and signature updates

2009-01-17 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:45:09AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: I'm not sure if this even violates Debian's policy,... but it seems that some files that should be in /var/something are placed in /usr/lib/tiger. I mean stuff like /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/signatures

Bug#512079: package structure and signature updates

2009-01-16 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Package: tiger Version: 1:3.2.2-8 Severity: wishlist Hi. I'm not sure if this even violates Debian's policy,... but it seems that some files that should be in /var/something are placed in /usr/lib/tiger. I mean stuff like /usr/lib/tiger/systems/Linux/2/signatures