Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org writes:
Martin Pitt [2009-02-05 23:57 +0100]:
TBH this is not really the time to fiddle with it, for Lenny I'd just
back out the original change completely.
Done and uploaded, debdiff attached.
Unblocked by luk, this will go into lenny soonish.
Marc
--
severity 514132 grave
thanks
I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%)
of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard.
Therefore I consider grave as the right severity. However, I do not want to
play bug tracking ping-pong, I just
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Michael Meskes wrote:
severity 514132 grave
thanks
I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%)
of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard.
Do you mean that it is a regression compared to etch ? If yes, I
* Michael Meskes [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:34:54 +0100]:
severity 514132 grave
thanks
I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%)
of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard.
Therefore I consider grave as the right severity.
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:59:48PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org
wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Michael Meskes wrote:
severity 514132 grave
thanks
I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about
80%)
of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2009-02-05 20090205125948.gb16...@rivendell
Do you mean that it is a regression compared to etch ? If yes, I agree
that it should be RC.
It is a regression:
[0] 14:49 m...@etch-amd64.volta:/etc/postgresql/8.1 1j $ sudo pg_ctlcluster 8.1
db2 start
[0] 14:50
Hello all,
Adeodato Simó [2009-02-05 14:02 +0100]:
If I'm not mistaken, you're a PostgreSQL-savy persion, so in the absence
of the maintainer's opinion, I think it's appropriate to take your assessment
on the severity of this bug.
It doesn't match grave in the text book sense of the Debian
found 514132 95
found 472627 94lenny1
thanks
Hello again,
Martin Pitt [2009-02-05 23:57 +0100]:
TBH this is not really the time to fiddle with it, for Lenny I'd just
back out the original change completely.
Done and uploaded, debdiff attached.
@release team: This is a direct revert of the
8 matches
Mail list logo
