Bug#514690: Regarding RFS: Artha

2009-02-20 Thread Sundaram
I would not recommend to try this to others. ;-) Point taken. Gee! That (checking in) was fast for a single dosage of pestering ;) Thanks for checking in the control files. I have received a mail telling that the ITP bug is now tagged 'pending'. Also a mail on artha_0.8.0-1_i386 which says

Bug#514690: Regarding RFS: Artha

2009-02-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote: I would not recommend to try this to others. ;-) Point taken. Gee! That (checking in) was fast for a single dosage of pestering ;) That's why I recommended pestering - because it is normally helpful (in my case). ;-) Thanks for checking in the control

Bug#514690: Regarding RFS: Artha

2009-02-19 Thread Sundaram
Hi Andreas, I was wondering if you have uploaded the package to the Debian repository. I apologize if I sound demanding or pestering here :) I am just curious, how will I know if the upload of the package is done or if the check-in of the control files into the Debian Science SVN is done?

Bug#514690: Regarding RFS: Artha

2009-02-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote: I was wondering if you have uploaded the package to the Debian repository. I apologize if I sound demanding or pestering here :) No pestering me is the right way to go. My plan is to do this either at the weekend or at least next monday. Just try

Bug#514690: Regarding RFS: Artha

2009-02-19 Thread Sundaram
Hi, Wow! Never knew you would recommend pestering :0 I am perfectly fine by the usage of cdbs, as you told earlier that its convenient for you to keep track. Well I will remind (pester) you again tomorrow night, as a precursor to the weekend's :) Thanks! Sundaram

Bug#514690: Regarding RFS: Artha

2009-02-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote: Wow! Never knew you would recommend pestering :0 SUre - but I have only the right to advise this for one single person (=me). I would not recommend to try this to others. ;-) I am perfectly fine by the usage of cdbs, as you told earlier that its