Bug#518893: Lost gfortran and f95 support regression

2009-03-22 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, You mentioned in a private email that you mis-filed the version, that this bug is already fixed in 0.16 and you found it against 0.15. Can you verify? At Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:52:39 +0900, Andrew Buckeridge wrote: Package: binfmtc Version: 0.16-1 It had Fortran 95 support for a while,

Bug#518893: Lost gfortran and f95 support regression

2009-03-22 Thread Andrew Buckeridge
Package: binfmtc Version: 0.15-1 On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:59:38 +0900 Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote: Hi, You mentioned in a private email that you mis-filed the version, that this bug is already fixed in 0.16 and you found it against 0.15. Can you verify? Yes, should have been

Bug#518893: Lost gfortran and f95 support regression

2009-03-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I don't use much fortran, could you prepare a patch? At Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:52:39 +0900, Andrew Buckeridge wrote: Package: binfmtc Version: 0.16-1 It had Fortran 95 support for a while, but now it has gone. The problem with the magic c BINFMTF: is that 'c' is not in the Old Fortran

Bug#518893: Lost gfortran and f95 support regression

2009-03-08 Thread Andrew Buckeridge
Package: binfmtc Version: 0.16-1 It had Fortran 95 support for a while, but now it has gone. The problem with the magic c BINFMTF: is that 'c' is not in the Old Fortran character set +-0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQR/STUVWXYZ='.)$*,( , but neither is ':' or the compiler options. Porting back to the