2009/3/16 Frank Lichtenheld dj...@debian.org:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 01:35:55PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
Please remove the source package pocketpc-binutils. I've also
requested the removal of its only reverse dependency pocketpc-gcc.
These toolchains are based on an obsolete version of GCC.
There is an additional reverse-dependency: pocketpc-sdk
Shaun Jackman wrote...
The Pocket PC toolchain has been essentially unmaintained for a long
time. I haven't had a Pocket PC device in years. I've requested that
the pocketpc toolchain be removed from the Debian's unstable archive.
The packages will still be available in etch and lenny.
The bug numbers requesting removal from the archive are 519874,
519875, and 519877 for the packages pocketpc-binutils, pocketpc-gas
and pocketpc-gcc. You are the maintainer of the package pocketpc-sdk.
Should I request its removal as well?
2009/3/15 Eric House eeho...@eehouse.org:
I think so.
Just FYI, last week I started filling out an ITP for the cegcc toolchain.
After using it for two years and shipping a release with it I finally
managed to build the damn thing and so ought to be able to get it into
Debian. The upstream is active and supportive of my packaging it, so it
seems a worthy successor.
--Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
