On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or
LGPL without any version info given; while those need to be GPLv2 or
later in order to have a chance to be compatible with Apache 2.0.
The GPL and LGPL when
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:40:48PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or
LGPL without any version info given; while those need to be GPLv2 or
later in order to have
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:00:36AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:40:48PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or
LGPL without any version
Well ... check out our current package in the chromium-daily ppa ...
thats the progress we are making. feel free to help on the licensing
issues left - which is a huge effort still imo ...
the upstream bug on this is here:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291
On Fri, Nov
Copying Alexander Sack to your question:
* Guido Trotter ultrot...@debian.org [2009-11-17 10:42]:
Hi,
Any news on this? Otherwise it might be wise to retitle as RFP.
(I will do this in 7 days, if the package is not uploaded, or there is no
further comment regarding this on the bug).
Hi,
Any news on this? Otherwise it might be wise to retitle as RFP.
(I will do this in 7 days, if the package is not uploaded, or there is no
further comment regarding this on the bug).
Thanks,
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
6 matches
Mail list logo
