Hi Andreas,
three remarks:
- if you ask others for review, you shouldn't have whitespace changes in the
diff.
- you shouldn't _restart_ the daemon in postrm :-) (and probably not call
dictconfig neither)
- besides that, looks ok.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
- if you ask others for review, you shouldn't have whitespace changes in the
diff.
Yes - sorry. I somehow expected this hint after I sended the mail.
- you shouldn't _restart_ the daemon in postrm :-) (and probably not call
dictconfig neither)
On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
Well, the dictd daemon is *not* part of the dict-wn package. So it might /
will exist after removing dict-wn. The package dict-wn just provides one
possible data file for dict and if it is removed the dictd daemon needs to
know this (via a
Package: wordnet
Version: 1:3.0-13
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left processes running on
the system after installation and removal. This is due to directly
calling /etc/rc.d/ scripts
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left processes running on
the system after installation and removal. This is due to directly
calling /etc/rc.d/ scripts in your packages maintainer scripts, which is a
violation of policy 9.3.3.2 and
5 matches
Mail list logo