Bug#526614: fdm dies trying to deliver via | sendmail

2009-05-18 Thread Frank Terbeck
I will _not_ go ahead and ask for an upload to stable without this patch being tested. And since the original reporter backed out before doing that... Anyway, I'll attach the patch provided by Nicholas - tweaked a little to work with quilt - to this message. Anyone who wants to test it, is

Bug#526614: fdm dies trying to deliver via | sendmail

2009-05-08 Thread Frank Terbeck
Nicholas Marriott nicholas.marri...@gmail.com: Yes, it is probably because it is setuid. fdm calls kill(pid, 0) to see if the process has actually started. This isn't actually needed, it is a debugging aid. In any case, if it gets EPERM it is probably safe to assume the process does exist.

Bug#526614: fdm dies trying to deliver via | sendmail

2009-05-04 Thread Frank Terbeck
[ Ccing the fdm-users mailing list. Please reply to all addresses in ] [ To: and Cc: in order to keep all involved parties and the debian ] [ BTS in the loop. ] Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org: Package: fdm Version: 1.5-3 Severity: normal I

Bug#526614: fdm dies trying to deliver via | sendmail

2009-05-04 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Yes, it is probably because it is setuid. fdm calls kill(pid, 0) to see if the process has actually started. This isn't actually needed, it is a debugging aid. In any case, if it gets EPERM it is probably safe to assume the process does exist. Please try this diff: Index: command.c

Bug#526614: fdm dies trying to deliver via | sendmail

2009-05-02 Thread Ian Zimmerman
Package: fdm Version: 1.5-3 Severity: normal I tried to make fdm deliver directly to sendmail (exim actually) with a config line like this: action default pipe /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -odi i...@localhost match all action default but i get this in the log: May 2 00:35:01 matica fdm[7686]: