Hello Chris,
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Chris Lamb la...@debian.org wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Removing the 'chroot .' should be all that's necessary, plus testing of
course.
You need to remove the --exclude=target bit too, as that's not supported
in busybox tar. (This was only a
Joey Hess wrote:
Removing the 'chroot .' should be all that's necessary, plus testing of
course.
You need to remove the --exclude=target bit too, as that's not supported
in busybox tar. (This was only a paranoid measure anyway.)
Patch attached for clarity. Tested using d-i daily i386 build.
Christian Perrier wrote:
Hey Joey, are you aware of other places we could also change the use
of tar (certainly I can look by myself but I'm first trying to use
your great memory of historical stuff in D-I..:-))
TTBOMK, this is the only place in d-i where we *create* a tar file, and
so the
Joey Hess wrote:
chroot . tar c . --exclude=target | \
(chdir /target tar xv) | \
Removing the 'chroot .' should be all that's necessary, plus testing of
course.
very nice. i'll test it tomorrow.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3,
Package: live-installer
Severity: normal
busybox-udeb now supports tar creation, so this code can be fixed to
not use tar from the live system:
# use tar from inside the live filesystem to create
# the tarball, because busybox tar in d-i does not
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
Package: live-installer
Severity: normal
busybox-udeb now supports tar creation, so this code can be fixed to
not use tar from the live system:
Hey Joey, are you aware of other places we could also change the use
of tar (certainly I can look by myself
6 matches
Mail list logo
