On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 08:00:14PM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote:
first thanks for your report and trying to make Debian better. :-)
Thanks! :)
But I have to close your report, because it is not a circular dependency as
written in Debian policy 7.2. The problem with circular depends are at
I'm not absolutely sure, but I think
that on Ubuntu, packages under Recommends are installed, it would a
pitty to make a specific version just to remove this type of
dependency.
Please never do that: take the time to research an issue before mentionning
it in a bug report, else it amount to
Package: luckybackup
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
There are circular dependencies between luckybackup and luckybackup-data.
That could create problems and it's best to be avoided.
luckybackup-data can live on its own, so either should be fine:
- there's no need for Recommends:
- drop the dependency to Enhances: luckybackup (probably depend on the
binary/source version too?)
Actually, I think there's no need for binary/source version
dependency, since it's just Enhances. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
first thanks for your report and trying to make Debian better. :-)
Thanks! :)
But I have to close your report, because it is not a circular dependency as
written in Debian policy 7.2. The problem with circular depends are at the
dpkg part, not apt{itude}, and dpkg does not care about
5 matches
Mail list logo
