I was informed that Rafael Laboissiere, the maintainer, is not
involved in Debian development.
This package is too import for me to play with (since I'm still a
beginner at packaging). If you know someone that wishes to take over,
please do!
Also, it's too risky to include a patch for older
I was informed that Rafael Laboissiere, the maintainer, is not
involved in Debian development.
This package is too import for me to play with (since I'm still a
beginner at packaging). If you know someone that wishes to take over,
please do!
Typos:
I was informed that Rafael Laboissiere, the
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The libmtp7 package contains the file /etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp7.rules. This
file is not touched by libmtp8, AFAIK.
On the other hand, libmtp5 seems to be affected by the following offending
code in postinst:
if dpkg --compare-versions $2
* Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org [2009-06-03 08:54]:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
The libmtp7 package contains the file /etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp7.rules. This
file is not touched by libmtp8, AFAIK.
On the other hand, libmtp5 seems to be affected by the following
@Sean: thank you for the tip, didn't know that! :)
Sean, can you reply with the output of:
apt-cache policy libmtp5 libmtp6
apt-cache rdepends libmtp5 libmtp6
I really need to see where they came from, if they were manually
installed (or from another source) and if any packages depend on it.
Rafael, you are right, it probably will. But I'm worried about these:
(1) Is the remaining /etc/udev/libmtp.rules (and symlink
/etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp.rules) going to affect libmtp8? We'll have to
ask upstream I guess.
hi savvas,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote:
@Sean: thank you for the tip, didn't know that! :)
Sean, can you reply with the output of:
apt-cache policy libmtp5 libmtp6
libmtp5:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
0.1.5-2 0
100
* Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com [2009-06-03 12:51]:
Rafael, you are right, it probably will. But I'm worried about these:
(1) Is the remaining /etc/udev/libmtp.rules (and symlink
/etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp.rules) going to affect libmtp8? We'll have to
ask upstream I guess.
CC'ed the bug report
2009/6/3 Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com:
Sean, thank you, very helpful!
Rafael:
That said, i am wondering why the libmtp.rules files should be versioned,
as we are doing currently. Perhaps, the 45-libmpt8.rules files would
work just fine with previous versions (5, 6,
That's quite an old package, I don't see it in the supported releases:
http://packages.debian.org/libmtp5
Can you explain how did this happen?
I can only assume that you upgraded, but from which older release to
which one, using which commands? :)
Also, reply with the output of:
apt-cache policy
I'm not completely sure, but I think the package is missing
Conflicts and Replaces for older libmtp* packages?
Something like:
Conflicts: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
Replaces: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
..in debian/control.in and debian/control files.
Thoughts?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com [2009-06-02 12:50]:
I'm not completely sure, but I think the package is missing
Conflicts and Replaces for older libmtp* packages?
Something like:
Conflicts: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
Replaces: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
..in debian/control.in and
I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
updated to the latest available package:
libmtp8 0.3.7-7
Sean, is my assumption true?
Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is Breaks allowed on older libmtp* packages?
It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rules (not
In sum: never, ever try to implement Conflicts/Replaces as proposed
above.
Noted! :)
I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
updated to the latest available package:
libmtp8 0.3.7-7
Sean, is my assumption true?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[Cc:ing to the BTS, this time, sorry.]
* Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com [2009-06-02 15:51]:
Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is Breaks allowed on older libmtp* packages?
No, for the same reason Replaces is not allowed.
It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rules (not in /lib)
The
* Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com [2009-06-02 15:51]:
Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is Breaks allowed on older libmtp* packages?
No, for the same reason Replaces is not allowed.
It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rules (not in /lib)
The libmtp7 package contains the file
2009/6/2 Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com:
..which is removed by debian/libmtp.postinst.in:
rm -f /etc/udev/libmtp.rules
Correction:
..which is removed by debian/libmtp.preinst.in:
rm -f /etc/udev/libmtp.rules
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
hiya,
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:49:42PM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote:
I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
updated to the latest available package:
libmtp8 0.3.7-7
Sean, is my assumption true?
note sure for the last email whether you still needed this, but
18 matches
Mail list logo
