[Michael Meskes]
Maybe. Is there a way I can access your binary? Or could you simply
mail it to me? I'd like to test it.
Fetch the new source from
URL:svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/initscripts-ng/trunk/src/insserv.
I've commited the new patches there.
The test suite is debian/run-testsuite, if
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:55:52PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
It should get K01 together with any other script listing $all as a
stop dependency.
Right, and since no other did list $all it should be the only one.
Not really. It work when I test it in the test suite.
Perhaps you are
Using the sources from Debian svn for the package worked. It seems I had to
apply more patches. Anyway, now watchdog get K01 all for itself when listing
$all in Required-Stop.
Thanks.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at
I'm sorry, my last report was incorrect. I only checked runlevel 1 for which
the links were okay. In 0 and 6 however I still have alsa-utils, cryptdisks,
fuse, urandom and wpa-ifdown in K01 although none of them uses $all.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
I'm sorry, my last report was incorrect. I only checked runlevel 1 for which
the links were okay. In 0 and 6 however I still have alsa-utils, cryptdisks,
fuse, urandom and wpa-ifdown in K01 although none of them uses $all.
Hmmm
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:27:34PM +0200, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
I'm sorry, my last report was incorrect. I only checked runlevel 1 for which
the links were okay. In 0 and 6 however I still have alsa-utils, cryptdisks,
fuse,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:45:36PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:27:34PM +0200, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
I'm sorry, my last report was incorrect. I only checked runlevel 1 for
which
the links were
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Werner Fink wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:45:36PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:27:34PM +0200, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
I'm sorry, my last report was
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Werner Fink wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Michael Meskes]
Just imagine a logger that is supposed to log all actions done while
shutting down the system or, as in my case, a daemon whose job it is
[Dr. Werner Fink]
Let's see ... how does this patch works for you?
Worked just fine. Had to apply it manually because it had slight
conflicts with the other patches we use.
When do you plan a new insserv release?
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:50:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Worked just fine. Had to apply it manually because it had slight
conflicts with the other patches we use.
Am I correct to assume that the debian patch 60_something needs to be removed?
At least that's what I did to get it all
[Michael Meskes]
Am I correct to assume that the debian patch 60_something needs to
be removed? At least that's what I did to get it all the patches to
apply.
Yes. I had to drop it too.
Does anyone of you see a mistake here? Should this make watchdog
become the sole K01 script?
It should
Package: insserv
Version: 1.12.0-10
Severity: wishlist
Just imagine a logger that is supposed to log all actions done while shutting
down the system or, as in my case, a daemon whose job it is to monitor other
daemons and, if they do not run anymore, either restart that daemon or the
whole
[Michael Meskes]
Just imagine a logger that is supposed to log all actions done while
shutting down the system or, as in my case, a daemon whose job it is
to monitor other daemons and, if they do not run anymore, either
restart that daemon or the whole system. It's fairly easy to make
the
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Michael Meskes]
Just imagine a logger that is supposed to log all actions done while
shutting down the system or, as in my case, a daemon whose job it is
to monitor other daemons and, if they do not run anymore, either
15 matches
Mail list logo
