On 18 March 2015 at 11:59, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> And really, the best way to get this fixed is to write the missing manpage.
Attached. Please add to the Debian package.
linux-boot-prober.8
Description: Binary data
os-prober.8
Description: Binary data
Chris Bainbridge (2015-03-18):
> On 18 March 2015 at 11:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >
> > Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug. If you want it to happen,
> > submit one. Artificially bumping the severity won't help.
>
> Isn't a missing man page a violation of the requirement stated in
> D
Hi Chris,
On Mittwoch, 18. März 2015, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On 18 March 2015 at 11:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug. If you want it to happen,
> > submit one. Artificially bumping the severity won't help.
>
> Isn't a missing man page a violation of th
On 18 March 2015 at 11:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug. If you want it to happen,
> submit one. Artificially bumping the severity won't help.
Isn't a missing man page a violation of the requirement stated in
Debian Policy Manual 12.1? Hence violation of p
Control: severity -1 normal
Debian Bug Tracking System (2015-03-18):
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > severity 542899 serious
> Bug #542899 [os-prober] os-prober: please add a man page
> Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug.
5 matches
Mail list logo
